WNBAGM

Cameron Brink

Los Angeles Sparks · F · 2026 stats, contract & trade value

Add Brink to the Trade Machine →
Talent score
47
#62 in the W
Trade value
49
#51 in the W
Contract surplus
+3.8
talent vs. salary expectation
Position
F
Talent & trade value 20–9966+ star40–65 rotationunder 40 fringe

Over her deal through 2027, Brink is outproducing her contract by 3.8 pts of talent — contract surplus averages every remaining year, with future seasons projected on the league aging curve and discounted.

Cameron Brink headshot

Cameron Brink

47
Los Angeles Sparks · F · age 24
Value & contract
Talent
47
Rotation
Trade value
49
Rotation
Surplus
+3.8
Fair value
Talent trend47– flat
954320
LG AVG
Last 30 daysToday
Contract2 yrs · $558K gtd
2026$494KNON-GTD
2027$558KGTD
GuaranteedNon-guaranteedTeam option

Box scoreper game · 30 GP
PoorGreatpercentile vs qualified
Points
61
9.6
Assists
46
1.5
Rebounds
82
5.0
Usage
83
24.5 %
Efficiency
79
60 % TS
On-court impactwRAPM · 1,137 poss · 2026-08-30
PoorGreatpercentile vs qualified
Offense
4
−3.0
Defense
69
+0.2

wRAPM — her effect on team net scoring per 100 possessions, adjusted for teammates and opponents.

Stands out for usage and rebounding; offense is the soft spot. Reads as a Rotation-level talent.
Talent outlook
2026
47 talent
2027
48 proj
4354
2028 · FA
49 proj
4357

Projected per stat on the fitted league aging curves (scoring fades, rebounding holds, minutes drive late decline) — 4,700 player-seasons, 1997–2025. Ranges are 10th–90th percentile from held-out backtest error. Years marked FA are past her current deal — projection only.

Career stats
SeasonTeamGPMPGPPGRPGAPGSPGBPGTOVFG%3P%FT%
2024LAS1522.07.55.31.71.12.32.339.8%32.3%84.0%
2025LAS1912.95.14.30.50.51.41.342.7%29.4%76.2%
2026LA3019.09.65.01.50.61.72.448.0%32.6%77.8%
Projected · 2027–2028
SeasonTalentPPGRPGAPG
2027488.94.81.5
2028499.25.01.5

Future-year talent figures above are projections on the league aging curve (fit from 4,692 player-seasons, 1997–2025), not measurements — they fade in the display because they should.How the projections work →

Best team fits

Her attribute profile scored against each team's current roster deficits — where she'd fill the biggest hole, not just where she'd be fun.

Portland Fire16-24 · thinnest in rebounding / size + playmaking / ball-handling · 1.9M space
build this trade · fit score 44
Connecticut Sun10-30 · thinnest in scoring + playmaking / ball-handling · 1.0M space
build this trade · fit score 40
Seattle Storm8-32 · thinnest in scoring + playmaking / ball-handling · 0.7M space
build this trade · fit score 38

What would it take?

A fair package each interested team would have to send for Cameron Brink — assembled and priced by the same engine that grades trades, most valuable pieces first until the outgoing value matches hers. The percentage is what that package is worth on the trade-value scale: 100% is an even match for Cameron Brink, above 100% a slight overpay to get there. Open one in the machine to tweak it.

Portland Fire sendscap-legal · 112% of Brink’s value
Emily Engstler
open this trade in the machine →
Connecticut Sun sendscap-legal · 100% of Brink’s value
Aaliyah Edwards
open this trade in the machine →
Seattle Storm sendscap-legal · 112% of Brink’s value
Awa Fam
open this trade in the machine →

A starting point, not a prediction — each package is the fewest fair pieces by model value, and a real deal would flex around roster fit and both front offices. “Needs a filler” means the salaries don't yet fit under the cap without another piece.

Los Angeles Sparks teammates

Aging comps

The closest player-seasons in league history (1997–2025) to her current age, per-36 profile, and role — the careers her projection walks alongside.

  • Natasha Howard · 2016 · age 25
  • Jonquel Jones · 2016 · age 23
  • Vanessa Hayden · 2006 · age 25

Similar players